The 6-3 decision, led by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, was a response to a suit that came during a hot-button period when social media was thick with contentious posts over COVID-19, vaccines, top government scientist Anthony Fauci, and other emotional topics. Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.
Barrett, writing for the majority, said the challengers argued that unfettered speech on social media is critical to their work as scientists, pundits and activists.
“But they do not point to any specific instance of content moderation that caused them identifiable harm,” Barrett wrote. “They have therefore failed to establish an injury that is sufficiently ‘concrete and particularized.’”
n what several supporters described as a “night and day” difference from his performance in last...
The Supreme Court ordered a new review of the law behind obstruction charges filed against hundreds...
When Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch voted Friday to decisively end the deference courts have given...
CNN is coming under heavy criticism after two of its top anchors failed to offer real-time...
