Already it is obvious that the four-man panel that constitutes the Chilcot Inquiry into the invasion of Iraq is patently not up to the job.
Everything suggests that they were deliberately chosen by Gordon Brown in order to avoid any properly forensic investigation into the greatest military disaster since Suez.
For a start, Sir John Chilcot himself appears to be on much too good terms with the witnesses. He seems incapable of asking any probing questions.
Who else is guilty in the greatest scandal of our times?
