One New York judge ruled the DNA evidence was scientifically sound. Another, just miles away, tossed it out as unreliable.
The same scenario is playing out in courthouses around the world amid a debate over whether a type of DNA analysis involving the amplification of tiny amounts of genetic material is reliable enough to convict someone for a crime.
The technique, known as low-copy number or high-sensitivity analysis can be used when investigators use "touch DNA" and are only able to collect a few human cells left behind when someone touches an object such as a gun, the handle of a knife, or even clothing.
While many prosecutors and forensic experts hail it as powerful tool that can help close cases, critics — most notably the FBI — argue it is inconclusive and unreliable. But there is no clear case law on the merits of the science, leaving judges to evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
More...
On Dec. 24, NASA's Parker Solar Probe will get closer to the sun than any human-made...
Two astronauts who traveled to the International Space Station aboard Boeing's troubled Starliner more than six...
Patient One was 24 years old and pregnant with her third child when she was taken...
Google on Monday announced Willow, its latest, greatest quantum computing chip. The speed and reliability performance...
