One New York judge ruled the DNA evidence was scientifically sound. Another, just miles away, tossed it out as unreliable.
The same scenario is playing out in courthouses around the world amid a debate over whether a type of DNA analysis involving the amplification of tiny amounts of genetic material is reliable enough to convict someone for a crime.
The technique, known as low-copy number or high-sensitivity analysis can be used when investigators use "touch DNA" and are only able to collect a few human cells left behind when someone touches an object such as a gun, the handle of a knife, or even clothing.
While many prosecutors and forensic experts hail it as powerful tool that can help close cases, critics — most notably the FBI — argue it is inconclusive and unreliable. But there is no clear case law on the merits of the science, leaving judges to evaluate it on a case-by-case basis.
More...
SpaceX launched its huge Starship rocket on the program's eighth test flight Thursday, but a malfunction...
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope is providing the best look yet at the chaotic events unfolding...
A commercial spacecraft carrying NASA experiments successfully touched down on the moon's surface early Sunday morning,...
As soon as the end of February, NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory will launch a...
