The Central Intelligence Agency’s health professionals repeatedly criticized the agency’s post-Sept. 11 interrogation program, but their protests were rebuffed by prominent outside psychologists who lent credibility to the program, according to a new report.
The 542-page report, which examines the involvement of the nation’s psychologists and their largest professional organization, the American Psychological Association, with the harsh interrogation programs of the Bush era, raises repeated questions about the collaboration between psychologists and officials at both the C.I.A. and the Pentagon.
The report, completed this month, concludes that some of the association’s top officials, including its ethics director, sought to curry favor with Pentagon officials by seeking to keep the association’s ethics policies in line with the Defense Department’s interrogation policies, while several prominent outside psychologists took actions that aided the C.I.A.’s interrogation program and helped protect it from growing dissent inside the agency.
A company owned by two of Donald Trump’s top mega-donors has routinely brought dozens of its...
A Dec. 2 Instagram post (direct link, archive link) includes an image of a news headline...
A crack in a Colorado ski lift forced the evacuation of more than 170 stranded skiers...
On the brink of losing their supermajority in the state legislature, North Carolina Republicans overrode a...
