The first of several British investigations into the e-mails leaked from one of the world's leading climate research centers has largely vindicated the scientists involved.
The House of Commons' Science and Technology Committee said they had seen no evidence to support charges that the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit or its director, Phil Jones, had tampered with data or perverted the peer review process to exaggerate the threat of global warming — two of the most serious criticisms levied against the climatologist and his colleagues.
In their report released Wednesday, the committee said that, as far as it was able to ascertain, "the scientific reputation of Professor Jones and CRU remains intact," adding that nothing in the more than 1,000 stolen e-mails, or the controversy kicked up by their publication, challenged scientific consensus that "global warming is happening and that it is induced by human activity."
Inquiry: Climate data not manipulated
Letters went out to hundreds of workers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) on...
Another round of torrential rain and flash flooding came Saturday for parts of the South and...
A large sponge, a cluster of anemones, and other life is seen nearly 230 meters deep...
Chevron has been ordered to pay more than $744m in damages for destroying parts of south-east...
